The Coalition
for Public Education Speaks Out Against Charter Schools
Junebug Jabbo Jones asks this simple question to
the Charter School-loving Black and Latino Parents: “If Charter Schools are so great, why aren’t white parents asking for
them?”
As last spring’s state
exams indicated, with very few exceptions (most of whom were mere test prep
factories)- charter schools are no better than traditional public schools.
Their performance had to disappoint every charter school parent, teacher, and
administrator. Given the poor outcomes, charter school parents should demand
and expect a renewed focus on improving learning for already-enrolled
students.
But these schools are not
about educating our children. They exist only to maximize the political influence
- and the associated profits of their investors.
So... these
privately-owned, “public schools” can declare a holiday -forcing their
unwilling staff, parents, and students to parade across the Brooklyn Bridge for
a media photo-op. Privatization, whether of prisons, healthcare, social
security, or education has been shown to be a pro-business gimmick that is
against the broader public interest.
The protesters here today
are well meaning but unwitting pawns of the charter school operators. Some parents,
frustrated with the failing system, see charters as the only alternative. They
fight to get their children in, and aggressively oppose anyone critical of the
policy.
The counterfeit “parent
associations” and “students first” groups are management-financed,
management-run, and management-controlled. They take no direction from parents,
who have no say in setting the agenda or priorities. These groups are replicas
of the “company unions,” they prevent real parent involvement.
The
Coalition for Public Education (CPE/CEP) is here today in support of public
education and in opposition to charter school expansion and co-location
programs. We support policies that require private, for-profit and nonprofit corporations
to identify, develop and finance their own facilities. Charter schools should
pay rent for the use of publicly owned buildings – in the same way that the
Mets pay for using Citifield or the USTA rents Louis Armstrong tennis
Stadium.
Charter schools are well
financed, highly-resourced corporations. They have the ability, and the
willingness to find and operate facilities to pay for their operations. Of
course, they will also seek and accept corporate welfare in the form of rent-free
space. Many neighborhoods, for example have recently-closed private or
parochial schools that are specifically designed for school use. These
corporations are capable of identifying their own facilities.
Charter School expansion – was originally sold as a type of
education laboratory; where new teaching methods could be developed for
incorporation into the existing system of public schools. Under Bloomberg (and,
regrettably, U.S. Education “Czar” Arnie Duncan,) charters have become a tool
in the battle against teacher unions. They
also serve to divert scarce public funds into the hands of profiteering charter
school corporations. A new form of political patronage; these school charters
are often used to reward go along, get along politicians who follow the orders
of the corrupt political machine.
The
Coalition for Public Education supports efforts to get independent
analysis of the true performance, the costs and benefits of charter schools.
Such an analysis cannot be done under the biased watch of the Bloomberg
administration.
The Coalition hereby
calls for the new Mayor, whomever that may be, to immediately implement a
moratorium on any new charter schools and perform an open, inclusive,
transparent analysis of the impact of charter schools on the education of our
children.
We call on charter school parents to sit
down with us in order to respectfully discuss our different views on education,
and develop a consensus-reached way forward to a stronger more democratic parent-teacher-student
led public school system.
www.forpubliced.org
and www.forpubliced.blogspot.com
Charter schools don't outperform regular public schools in attendance, nor are they better at boosting student achievement. They, like public schools, vary widely in both areas, but charters don't outperform publics in general. That Republicans are defending them is not a surprise since they want this school choice option to translate into public money paying for private schools. Also, many charters are for profit, unlike regular publics. Valen from online loan till pay day providing company.
ReplyDelete